Showing posts with label The Tommyknockers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Tommyknockers. Show all posts

Saturday, December 3, 2016

The Dark Half: We Are Back Like George Stark Crawling Out Of A Grave


In case you were wondering what happened to this blog, no, Tommyknockers did not force me to abandon this project, although I would have been entirely justified if I had bailed after it. I am not writing a separate post on it, because I feel like the two mini-posts about its terribleness suffice. I do have a bit more to say about it, but then it shall transform into my short-hand for describing SK writing at his worst (or maybe 'killer Coke machines' will be the short-hand..it's already a post label for this blog).

When I first started this project, one of the stated rules about it was that I was not going to set a time frame to finish reading all of SK's novels in chronological order. I am sticking to that rule. So here we are, two and a half years later, and I'm picking it up again. In between, I have moved from Florida to Massachusetts to Maine! So it feels particularly salient to reread all of SK's books as a Maine resident. Don't worry, I live in Portland, which is not close enough to scope out his house on a regular basis or anything weird. But there still are some Maine SK perks, such as a 'Maine' collection at my local library which has a copy of every one of his books.

Anyway, next in the series is The Dark Half, SK's first book after sobering up and a highly (auto-)biographical take on that process. I had read this book as a kid, likely soon after it came out, and mostly what I remembered was that the author's ghost-vampire-zombie (?) twin comes after the author and his family. The author (Thad Beaumont) had recently buried his pseudonym (George Stark) and vowed not to write as him again, which causes the pseudonym to come to life as a terrifying character. This situation mimics one that SK experienced in real life when he was revealed to be Ricahrd Bachmann, although presumably the remainder of this novel is chiefly fiction.

But Stark's supernatural origins go back more deeply than Thad imagines. He did have an actual twin that he 'swallowed' in the womb, and doctors extract actual recognizable human body parts like an eye out of the author's brain when he is a child. These basic plot points are what I remembered from my initial reading. It wasn't a scary book for me, unlike the lasting scars of IT or 'Salem's Lot, and I remember reading it at camp, so it must have been doubly un-scary, what with all of those potentially terrifying woods and such around (why was I reading SK at camp? In hindsight, this seems like it was a very bad idea). But I didn't remember liking it or hating it, or much more about it, to be honest.

So I was very pleasantly surprised when I found that not only is this a good book, it's a very good book, and it definitely shows that Sober SK is vastly superior to Addict SK. One of the most striking aspects of The Dark Half is the fact that the prose is so clear and precise, unlike the flailing passages of Tommyknockers, but also a problem that plagued the vast majority of his novels from The Stand onward. No description feels 'fuzzy.' I will say that I still blame editors for that at least in part, but this novel is so much better in that regard.

Here is my last comment on Tommyknockers (for real this time): in essence, it is a rewriting of IT, although the more realistic version. In both, an alien species comes to Earth and takes over a town. In both, a force rises to fight against the alien's power. With IT, it is The Losers Club, a group of children then adults brought together because they are ostracized from their peers. In Tommyknockers, the job falls to Gard, who takes the alien ship on a suicide mission to stop its harmful influence from spreading any further. Gard is a broken man, an alcoholic whose behavior has cost him his career and strained relationships with those around him. In contrast, while The Losers suffered as children, their lives are seemingly blessed as adults and many of them have achieved great success (except for the Jewish Stan Uris, who committed suicide, and why did you have to go making the Jewish kid the neurotic one, SK? Why???). In fact, this has been one of the major criticisms of IT: that the characters do not speak like people, but like stereotypes; that Bill, the author at the center of The Losers Club, is a self-aggrandized version of a person; and that their fates do not fit their traumatic childhood. Tommyknockers reverses all of this. Instead of being strengthened and blessed by an encounter with aliens, Gard is weakened and killed. That seems more realistic to me, and I wonder if SK's addiction problems are manifesting themselves in this bleak outlook--Gard, of course, is also a writer, but one who has reached a state that renders him incapable of producing good work.

The Dark Half is also a rewriting of one of SK's earlier novels: Misery. In both, an author is held hostage by an outside force and must write a book. Both novels have novels-within-novels: Misery's Return and the latest Alexis Machine book in The Dark Half. However, there is a fundamental difference: in Misery, Annie is Paul Sheldon's muse, even though she is a very dangerous one. She has no qualms about feeding his addiction to pills, keeping him hostage, or even maiming him to ensure that he will finish the work. Misery becomes grim as Paul gets closer to finishing the novel, as it is clear that he is physically close to death too. Even in the epilogue, when he is back in New York and enjoying new-found success as a writer, it's clear that he is permanently damaged, both physically and mentally. There is a question about whether his survival was a triumph, or if he will be able to recover.

On the surface, The Dark Half shows its protagonist as the stronger force against his evil twin. George Stark is less of a muse and more of Mr. Hyde to Thad Beaumont's Dr. Jekyll. Stark's books were violent thrillers and brought some kind of change to Thad's personality when he was writing under this pseudonym, at least from the recollections of his wife. While there are references to earlier alcoholism and smoking (nothing more harmful than that, although one wonders), these are not directly correlated with the Stark novels; however, Stark's blatant disregard for human life and his propensity for smoking and drinking suggests that these behaviors were mirrored by Thad when he was writing these books. Thad is able to overcome his evil twin through a supernatural conceit, although we see that the two men are more alike than he wants to admit. Of course, this plot undoubtedly reflects the concerns that SK must have had at the time as he started his sober life. Not only was he likely worried about how his creative talent would manifest itself in the absence of drugs, this novel reveals how concerned he was about whether his family, specifically his wife, would be capable of forgiveness. There are many scenes in The Dark Half that celebrate the tranquility of the mundane, particularly involving Thad and Liz's twin infants.

There is another major difference between SK's two fictional accounts of writing: the fate of The Dark Half's fictional novel is the opposite of that in Misery. Thad destroys it when he sets fire to his summer house after vanquishing his evil twin. In fact, SK dwells on the destruction of the manuscript, noting that the hand-written pages float into the night sky, then burn up. With this, Stark is gone and Thad goes back to his wife and kids, virtually unscathed. He does not seem broken, he seems whole, and this wholesomeness has allowed him to win the day. It's not hard to see that this ending is partially wishful thinking for the newly-sober SK, who hoped that he would be able to conquer his demons and return to the comfort of domesticity.

[For those of you who are SK superfans and want me to get ahead of myself, I won't. We'll talk about Thad Beaumont's fate in later novels when we get to later novels.]

Monday, April 28, 2014

Horrible writing from 'The Tommyknockers,' Part 2

This book needs to be over.  It is SO BAD.  There are less than a hundred pages left and I keep trying to sit down and finish it, but then it gets too bad.  I don't want to give away just how bad, but I will let these two examples speak for themselves:

One of life's great truths is this: when one is about to be struck by a speeding six-hundred-pound Coke machine, one need worry about nothing else.  There was a thudding, crunching sound.  The front of Leandro's skull shattered like a Ming vase hurled onto the floor.  A split second later his spine snapped.  For a moment the machine carried him along, plastered to it like a very large bug plastered to the windshield of a fast-moving car.  His splayed legs dragged on the road, the white line unreeling between them.  The heels of his loafers eroded to smoking rubber nodules.  One fell off.
 If your question is, 'Did a character just get attacked by a giant, moving Coke machine?', then the answer is, 'Yes, this novel is, in fact, that bad.'  Also, the similes.  The terrible, terrible similes.  They fall like a Ming vase hurled onto the floor.

One more, which comes from a scene where Bobbi is describing the nature of the aliens who are possessing the town:

We're builders, not understanders.

If you're curious, SK uses the not-a-word 'understanders' more than once.  I mean, I am all for blaming his addled state for this catastrophe, but I also have to ask, where were his editors?


Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Horrible writing from 'Tommyknockers,' Part 1

I have a feeling this will be a multi-post topic.

I have started The Tommyknockers.  It is as bad as I remember.  Actually, I don't remember much about it, so it must be super bad.  And it is.  For instance, one of the characters is constantly referenced by her last name.  Think it over.  It's weird.  It feels wrong.  It feels lazy.  Ugh.

Anyway, I figured that at least if I can revel in the terrible writing, it might make it slightly more fun.  So here is the best passage I have found so far:

When he got drunk, his heart got hot.  The nukes.  The goddam nukes.  It was symbolic, yeah, okay, you didn't really have to be Freud to figure out that what he was really protesting was the reactor in his own heart.  When it came to matters of restraint, James Gardener had a bad containment system.  There was some technician inside who should have long since been fired.  He sat and played with all the wrong switches.  That guy wouldn't be really happy until Jim Gardener went China Syndrome.

I just........yeah.  Possibly the lengthiest and worst metaphor in SK's oeuvre, although I have a feeling that there are still more gems to come.

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

The Talisman (OMG You Guys, This Book Is Really Good!!!!!)

When I started this project, I don't think that I was anticipating the discovery of any great SK books that I did not already know.  I figured that I was vaguely aware of his oeuvre, enough so that I had read the ones that I liked and that the others would probably not be up my alley.  Sure, there were some pleasant surprises (like The Dead Zone), but for the most part I was right.  Books that I figured I would not really like that much, such as Christine and Firestarter, were not my favorites.

I also was less than enthused about reading The Talisman for two reasons.  First, it was really long.  Ugh.  Second, there is a sticker on my library copy that states unequivocally that this book is science fiction.  Ugh.  Not that I don't like science fiction (I am writing this while watching an episode of original Star Trek), but from my previous encounter with SK's version of science fiction I was not impressed.  By which I mean The Tommyknockers, which gets a full 5/5 in ughs from me.  We will see how I think about it after a reread but from what I remember, it was a clunker.

However, as soon as I started The Talisman, I pretty freaking much loved it.  It is like the Dark Tower in only one book (so the length is now okay with me).  And it was in no way science fiction.  The sticker totally lied.  It was fantasy, and it blended together a large number of fantasy tales along with it, which was awesome.  Also, it has all kinds of ties with his other work.  Before, when people asked me which SK novel I would recommend for those new to his oeuvre, I would give this super long, drawn-out response.  Now my answer is The Talisman.

So what is in here?  Everything!  Narnia, lots of Narnia (and it even references the Narnia references): sick mother (The Magician's Nephew) and closets to other worlds (The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe).  Lord of the Rings, particularly when Jack almost can't give the talisman to anyone else (......precious........).  Future King books (people are dim, like Flagg will be in The Eyes of the Dragon).  Scary monsters in tunnels/sewers.  A haunted hotel.  A guy who is kind of like Tom from The Stand, only he is also a werewolf, so he is also kind of like a dog in human form (Wolf).  Tom Sawyer.  In other words, the same blend of features that make The Dark Tower work: eclectic combinations of references and influences.  And you know what?  It's fun too.

In fact, I think that in some ways it is even better than many other King novels because of its clarity.  King wrote this in tandem with his friend Peter Straub and maybe Straub cleaned up some of his prose.  The action sequences felt particularly clean and easy to follow.  I don't always find that with King, and I have always assumed that this is because he was cranking through so many books that sometimes things got by that were obtuse.  This time around though, it was really simply to follow what he was saying, particularly in the action scenes because they were so vivid.  I still remember them now.

So, if you are looking for a fun Stephen King book that is kind of long but not obnoxiously so, then I highly recommend The Talisman.  And I am already looking forward to reading it again someday.

(T-2 until IT)